Namo WebEditor 2006
Namo WebEditor 2006 suite is one of the most complete Web authoring applications of all time and quite possibly the only software you will need to create, edit, publish and manage your websites. An integrated development environment empowers Web professionals to create cutting-edge sites. Easy-to-use functions enable beginners to grow into highly-skilled Web designers. Take advantage of new themes, smart clip arts, flash buttons, card templates and more -- all to help make your Website look smart and cool Smart ClipArt editor lets you create your own banners and buttons, and transforms them into images
Namo WebEditor 2006 Accessories
 HTML, XHTML, and CSS, Sixth Edition (Visual Quickstart Guide)
The Name of the Wind (The Kingkiller Chronicle, Day 1)
The Thing (Collector's Edition)
Namo WebEditor 2006 Reviews
etc etc. The bugs that I have encountered are so inconsistent that it is really hard to say what causes them to occur. However I must stress that if this were my only tool for mantaining and updating a website -I would seek another one. If you go online for help -the moderators are likely to answer a question that you didn't ask and close the issue immediately. If you persevere through all the issues and learn a little manual HTML -you will have a working website. This is not a professional product and more suited for someone who is learning about websites.
There is also a problem with saving different changes of files under different names. The problem with Namo is that bugs abound in their software and there is poor customer service. However, despite the bugs -this webeditor is well priced. It seems that every so often a rollover goes dead.
They recently released or are about to release "WebEditor Professional." In the Namo forum, one of their alleged support techs said it is not an upgrade, just a repackaging. 6 is unstable and 2006 is good. The pluses: This is easier to learn and far cheaper than Dreamweaver and has features Dreamweaver does not, built-in scripts being one of them. The minuses: As many say, I found there is no customer support. I bought an OEM of DreamweaverMX real cheap when they came out with the next edition and still find it to be a steep learning curve and lacking in features that Namo has.
Another forum user says v. I started with v. I seldom use Dreamweaver. 5, used 5.5 and 6, and am trying the 2006 demo to see what's really different. Also, sometimes when working in WYSIWYG mode it will sometimes start throwing in hard spaces ( ) between words which means they will not wrap.
I just have not seem much change from 6 to 2006 so I have not bought it yet. My current version, (6) blows up every now and again, when deleting something.
(FrontPage ignores it; Namo's needs manual tweaking or else it'll repeat every CSS entry.). I downloaded their Vista patch, which says it fixes a problem where Vista reboots when the program is installed. INSTALLED. Guess what happened when I tried installing, because I assumed the wording was due to imperfect Korean->English translation.
It rebooted. Not launched. FrontPage may be Microsoft-centric, but the bloat isn't as asphyxiating as Namo's offering.
Not to mention the program does generate a LOT of bloat. [.].
The logic of the programmers still leaves a lot to be desired, however. No, it seems the linguistics were just fine. Of course, installing the patch fails because it says the program isn't installed.
I had used this product 'successfully' on XP, but agree with the other commenters here about stability and poor customer support. especially with CSS.
IMHO, WebEditor 2K6 Rocks. If you are looking for a modestly priced web editor with lots of capability, I think you should give this one a try. If you prefer to use code, you can do that too. I can't comment on the Tech Support, because I have never needed it.
separate from my operating system drive, and burn them to a CD.just in case. For my modest site editing needs it is every bit as capable as Dreamweaver. (And easier than working in Word at times). The help screens are all that I've needed. You can also use a split screen to see the code as you create. The multiple interface (Edit, Html, or edit/html) make designing your web site easy whether you like drag-and-drop or using code. I have never had it crash, and the FTP client included works flawlessly. I have used Namo WebEditor since v 5.5.
(I don't have the manual, because I downloaded my copy from Namo). In "Edit" mode the word processor-like interface makes web page design drag-and-drop simple. I have also tried DW, FP, Nvu, GoLive, and Mozilla, plus a couple of others I can't recall (that's how memorable they were). For the money, I think this a fast, easy, dependable editor. BTW - I always save a copy of downloaded progs and serial nos. Despite what some reviewers have said, this program is rock solid on my computer.
Internally, instead of storing & quot; it only stores & quot (SOMETIMES). What is the reason. You can download WE2006 from Namo's website, which should convince you to look elsewhere. GS&R screwed up almost ONE-THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED double quotes. Even if that is not what you are replacing.
I have one site with over a HUNDRED pages. Regarding Namo's built-in templates, most of them are terrible although they are signficantly improved over Namo 6. I bought Namo 5.5 several years ago when I needed support for non-Latin alphabets to do a Russian website. My advice. Recently I noticed a HUGE flaw in WebEditor 2006 and it is also in Namo 6Global Search & Replace adds a space after EVERY double quote (ASCII 34). If you are doing a simple website and don't need templates, etc., (which don't work so well with Namo anyway), download Netscape 7.2 for free, which includes and HTML editor. Today I found a spelling error (on every page) and tried to use GS&R.
On the plus side, when I finally got disgusted of trying to get a response from Namo, which has had my tech support request on this "in progress" for 2 months, I looked at several other editors and didn't find anything better in this price range. Regarding the free WebCanvas graphics editor, if you can figure out how to use it, I'd sure like to know. It screwed up the double quotes again, so I loaded the backup and I'll have to change them all manually. They're fine if you want to produce a personal website but they just don't look professional. I gradually used it to change my various sites (about 22).
|
